Use of pool servers reveals unacceptable crash rate in async DNS

[Clark B. Wierda]

A question:

How are pool entries added when the service decides it needs more?

Would it be possible to leverage this code for adding all servers specified
by name?  The DNS cost would be the same.  This only difference is the name
used for the query.

Once a server is associated, the IP is used.  There should be no impact on
the time calculations after an association is provisioned.

Clark B. Wierda

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net> wrote:

>
> Possible crazy idea...
>
> How about we never kill the DNS helper thread.  Just let it sit there in
> case
> it gets more work to do.  The only cost is a bit of memory.
>
> Or maybe only do that if we are locking stuff into memory.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160627/f42349ed/attachment.html>