More on utmpx and friends

[Mark Atwood]

I agree, drop it.   If later someone asks for it back, we can figure out a
better way to implement it.

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 2:55 AM Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:

> Hal Murray <hmurray at megapathdsl.net>:
> > That routing gets used in libntp/systime.c, there is about 10 lines of
> code.
> > Looks like it writes a couple of records to the file.  It looks
> redundant to
> > me.  Is there a reason we are preserving that code?
>
> Um, it looked vaguely like it might be useful to someome sometime?
>
> I wouldn't be bothered if we dropped it.
> --
>                 <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> devel at ntpsec.org
> http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ntpsec.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20160210/22f1dae9/attachment.html>