Version numbering RFC
ghane0 at gmail.com
Sat Dec 31 08:25:15 UTC 2016
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> wrote:
> My proposal is that we change this before more water has gone under
> the dam. That is:
> 1. VERSION should correspond to the last tag, not tne next one.
> 2. It should *not* be bumped when we ship 0.9.6 - that will bring it
> into sync with the new convention.
> 3. After 0.9.6, I will add logic to bump the contents of VERSION after
> shipping to devel/release, with --major, --minor, and --point
I can see commit 76e974cf
sanjeev at X201wily:~/SRC/ntpsec$ git show 76e974cf
Author: Mark Atwood <mark.atwood at ntpsec.org>
Date: Fri Dec 30 21:16:45 2016 +0000
Signed-off-by: Mark Atwood <mark.atwood at ntpsec.org>
sanjeev at X201wily:~/SRC/ntpsec$ git describe
Is this a missing tag in git?
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel