PARSE clocks.

[Amar Takhar]

On 2015-11-30 10:52 -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
> 
> verm at darkbeer.org said:
> > I need to separate them individually for testing.  Having them all in at
> > once  will confuse things. 
> 
> Could you please say more.  What are you trying to test?

I'm not actually trying to test the code but do precise coverage reports so I 
can give meaningful displays of how much each area of the code is used and by 
what.


> I haven't looked at the code.  Is there any interaction between sub-drivers, 
> or library modules that are only needed by some drivers?  Even if there is, 
> is it interesting, or important?

I don't know yet but the reports I'm working on should show this.


> There is already a blizzard of possible options.  Adding more just 
> complicates things.

I'm talking about expanding a list that's already there -- I don't think that's 
anymore complicated than what we have.

We've gone to great lengths to only include what's required to operate having 
all the drives placed in at once goes against what we already have.  It won't be 
any different from what's there instead of using '8' you will use '8m[1-12]'.


Amar.