ntpdsim status and question
Hal Murray
hmurray at megapathdsl.net
Thu Dec 31 10:34:36 UTC 2015
> What is the preferred approach?
I don't see any clean solution. The tangle with adj_systime and step_systime
in libntp is not the worst problem. If you build with SIM enabled, aside
from making a special libntp you also end up with broken versions of several
modules in ntpd so you can either build ntpd or ntpsim.
I'd probably try hacking the waf stuff to skip building anything else if it
was building ntpsim.
If you put SIM into config.h, you can delete libntp/systime_s.c
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
More information about the devel
mailing list